Biblical Landmarks

Archive for the ‘Symbolism’ Category

Do You Believe in the Power of Symbols?

As I’ve thought about the issues which have been the topic of the last few e-zines, I’ve come to a conclusion about the general response to those issues in the broader Christian community, and the response is nuts. It’s like staring at a business which is losing money, yet the business owner won’t make the changes necessary to plug up the holes. You tell him what needs to be done, but he can’t make the decision to invest the time and money to fix the problems. That decision doesn’t make sense. It’s nuts. With that in mind, read on.

Are you a nominalist or a realist? Have you figured that one out yet? Consider this.

In my last e-zine, I mentioned the older practice of symbols. For a nominalist, symbols and symbolism can appear to be strange. There are some personality styles that struggle with symbolism, but there are others who appreciate and understand symbols and their meaning.

Recently, on assignment in Calgary, I was helping a business owner make some changes to improve the business. He said his was a quality business, and he did make beautiful cabinet work in his kitchens. But I asked him about the symbols in his business that would indicate quality. The showroom was dusty and things left lying around. His personal dress was very casual, his hair was longish and somewhat untidy. His language was coarse except in front of the clients. These, I indicated, were the symbols of his business. I asked him which ones would tell people this was a quality business. He understood very well what I meant.

I made mention of the fact that at one time the baptismal font was at the doorway of the church. I remember seeing this as a teenager on the one occasion I visited the local Catholic Church to play organ for a wedding. It was not the first time I had seen a baptismal font — rather than a baptismal bathtub big enough for immersion to take place — but it was the first time I saw it at the doorway of the church.

Now a good part of my problem was that I was raised as a nominalist — not to believe in symbols. We had no cross in our little Baptist church. The only thing we had was a banner across the front that said “Be still and know that I am God.” I always figured that was there for us kids to keep us quiet during the service. It worked. While that text was up there, I wasn’t about to raise my voice unless I had an invitation.

But there was something else of significance which I did not realize at the time. The pulpit was off to the left-hand side of the building up against the wall. At the center was the communion table on which was prominently displayed a large open Bible.

It was many years before I understood the significance of the positioning of these items. I had been in an evangelical Anglican church at one time and also saw the pulpit on the side, the communion table and Bible in the center, and the lectern right beside it. When the pastor read the Scripture passages for the service, he always stepped to the lectern — front and center — but when he spoke he went back to the pulpit — right-hand side on this occasion. His movement from one spot to the other was strange, because I did not understand the significance of what he was doing and why he did it.

What picture do you get from these descriptions? If you just stop for a moment and think, it becomes evident that the centrality of the church service is the Bible and the communion table. They occupy center stage. The pulpit, the place where teaching is done, is not held in the same regard as the Scriptures themselves. Preaching — man’s word — cannot be the center of the church. Only God and His Word occupy that space. So the pulpit is over to the side.

Well, you don’t need to see what happens in many churches today. Center stage is for the preacher or the song leader. The communion table is probably nowhere to be seen. Anyway, the auditorium is too large to see anything except what’s displayed on the large screens.

What may be center is the lectern where not only the reading of Scripture is done, but also the preaching. In one church I’ve been in, one of the largest conservative Presbyterian churches in the US, a stool appears when the pastor’s ready to preach, and he’ll sit casually on the stool and speak just as if he’s in your living room. Great style! But no communion table and no Bible. Before the preacher gets on center stage, the space is occupied by the worship leader and musicians.

Symbolically, however, the message is that man’s word and God’s word occupy the same space at the center. This indicates not only the center of the church, but also the center of life. This is what the symbol means. And this is nuts!

Can you see why we cannot change the culture? Our symbols and the message they convey are all wrong. In the mind of many people man is already center stage. They have no need to go to church to get the same message. And to expect them to do otherwise is a greatly misplaced expectation.

God bless you as you serve Him this week.

The Power of Symbols

Have you figured it out yet?

“Figured what?” are you asking?

Have you figured out that symbols are a more powerful medium of communication than words?

It has been said that a pictures paints a thousand words, and that actions speak louder than words.

Well, so do symbols.

If you haven’t figured it out, let me encourage you to think about it like this. People remember only 20% of what they hear, but 70% of what they see.

Now, consider the symbols in the modern church. Here’s a list of them, and I’m not claiming this is an exhaustive list. It is certainly a list of the most obvious symbols.

Start with the music. The contemporary music fad in the church does nothing except symbolize the church’s commitment to modernity. It illustrates the church’s desire to be part of the world, rather than separate from it. It indicates that the church is no longer leading culture, but being led by it instead. Why would anyone in their right mind want to sign up with such an outfit? All it offers is a little fire and life insurance, as Dr. Rushdoony used to say.

The next obvious thing in the church is the dress styles of the leaders and members. The robe and gown have given way to open-necked shirt and, in some cases, denim pants. And how do the women in the church dress? Tight fitting bottoms and tops? That’ll tell you something, if you haven’t already guessed.

Where’s the baptismal font in the church? Is it missing? If so, what does this illustrate? It illustrates that baptism is no longer the entrance way into the faith. When the debate comes into the church about whether people should be baptized before they are permitted to the Lord’s Table, try to find out where the baptismal font is located. Is it at the doorway to the church like it still is in the older Catholic and Eastern churches? In many Protestant churches today the baptismal font cannot be seen. What does that tell you? Baptism is not important. That’s what it symbolizes.

And where is the Communion table? Is there one at all? If so, what’s on it? An open Bible, or something else?

At one time great cathedrals were built by Christians. They took decades to build. They were unique designs full of symbolism. They were positioned to make use of natural light that would display something of Faith, perhaps the sign of the cross through the stained-glass window, or whatever else had been placed in the walls to symbolize some aspect of the Faith. Then the ceilings and elsewhere were painted to display some aspect of biblical teaching.

Those cathedrals still stand today as landmarks to the Faith. They were not symbols of the culture of their time. They were unique illustrations of Christian faith, period. So unique in their culture that we often don’t know who designed them or who built them. The people behind them were unimportant. These cathedrals were not symbols of the culture of the time or of their designers or builders. They were — and remain — symbols of the faith of the Christians at that time and any other time.

And it is precisely because they are what they are, that we know they are symbols of the Christian faith then and now.

Now, have I convinced you yet of the power of symbols? If so, what are you going to do in your own situation? I really don’t know the answer to this question for myself. But I’ve got some ideas. Think about this.

What buildings would rise from the dust today to display our own understanding of the faith? Would we build unique Cathedrals, with a baptismal font at the doorway, the centrality of Christ displayed inside and outside for all to see, and a liturgy that constantly reminded people of creation, the fall, sin, and the Savior God provided to remedy the situation?

Would the acoustics in the building we design allow the individual to hear himself sing — with others — praises to God? The buildings today we call churches are designed so that the individual cannot hear himself or herself when they sing. The idea is not to build acoustically “live” church buildings. That doesn’t suit the noise that comes from the musicians. The acoustics are for the benefit of the pop musicians who have never gotten past third grade on their musical instrument, but somehow we are expected to accept their elementary efforts as acceptable standards for worship of a holy God. This also is nuts!

If our goal, on the other hand, is to get our symbols to match the words of our Faith, then what on earth are we going to do with the overhead projection unit, the drummer’s soundproofing shield, and the electric guitars?

Have a blessed week.